CPG, Food & AgTech
An enterprise ingredient sale is won in the R&D director’s evidence review, not the shopper’s imagination. Lab data, patent grounding, and regulatory-claim logic, sequenced before the commercial ask, decide whether a sample request ever happens.
The path to volume for a food or ag-tech innovator runs through a manufacturer’s formulation team, and that buyer purchases certainty: verifiable science, claims that survive legal review, supply that survives an audit. Consumer branding is the expensive detour; the evidence file is the road.
Industry research
The economics
FIGURES FROM THE FIRM’S RESEARCH · SOURCES ON REQUEST
Growth opportunities
Where the 2× lives
The evidence file, sequenced
Scientific authority arranged ahead of the commercial ask: verified lab data, the patent story, the citations, then the ROI case, then the sample request. Enterprise food buyers move through technical validation before procurement ever sees a price — the buyer journey runs in that order.
Regulatory claims as working logic
Labeling law encoded where the buyer can test it: thresholds computed live in the selling tools, claim language pre-drafted against the standard it invokes, so counsel reviews a position rather than builds one. Claims literacy is a credibility asset a formulation team can feel — and it shortens the legal review it never replaces.
The ingredient position
Selling the ingredient into other companies’ brands instead of fighting for shelf as one: licensing economics recur, ride the customer’s distribution, and change what the business is worth — the model shift that moves thin commodity margins.
The moat rebuild
Patent-expiry planning started years early: the certification seal, the clinical file, and the long-dated supply contracts assembled while exclusivity still holds, so the pricing power survives the cliff.
Our perspective
What most firms get wrong
Marketing to the shopper when the buyer is a scientist
The reflex in food innovation is consumer-brand spend — packaging, social, retail placement. But the volume path is B2B, and an R&D director reads a beautiful brand without a checkable evidence file as a warning, not an invitation. Credibility sequenced before commerce is the entire game.
Where we’d start
An evidence audit against one named target manufacturer: every claim classified as verified, pending, or unsupported; the label claims the product can honestly clear computed against the actual regulatory thresholds; and the technical-validation-to-sample-request path sequenced.
Put it to us